Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Pediatrics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0009922809332683v1
48/6/609    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yoon, E. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Clark, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yoon, E. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Clark, S. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Formulary Coverage for Lipid-Lowering Drugs Recommended for Children

Esther Y. Yoon, MD, MPH*, Gary L. Freed, Matthew M. Davis, and Sarah J. Clark

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: est{at}med.umich.edu.


   Abstract
Objective/methods. A cross-sectional assessment to describe availability, coverage, and pediatric labeling status of lipid-lowering drugs offered by 1 private and 1 public insurance plan formularies. Results. Both insurance plans had equal medication availability of bile acid sequestrants (7), statins (10), and cholesterol-absorption blockers (CAB; 1). The private plan had 3 bile acid sequestrants and 3 statins listed as preferred drugs; the CAB was not preferred. In contrast, the public plan had 5 bile acid sequestrants, 7 statins, and the CAB as preferred drugs. For medications with pediatric labeling, the private plan covered 50% as preferred drugs whereas the public plan covered 70% as preferred drugs. Conclusions. If new recommendations of the American Academy of Pediatrics for treatment of dyslipidemia in children were implemented today, children with the public plan would have equal choice but better coverage of lipid-lowering drugs as preferred drugs, including those with FDA approval, compared with children with the private plan.

First published on March 12, 2009, doi:10.1177/0009922809332683

Clinical Pediatrics 2009;48:609.

A more recent version of this article appeared on July 1, 2009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?