Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here to browse AJSM online!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Pediatrics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0009922808327106v1
48/3/291    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Casey, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Pichichero, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Casey, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Pichichero, M. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

A Comparison of 2 White Blood Cell Count Devices to Aid Judicious Antibiotic Prescribing

Janet R. Casey and Michael E. Pichichero*

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: michael_pichichero{at}urmc.rochester.edu.


   Abstract
A low or normal white blood cell (WBC) count is usually associated with viral illnesses. This study evaluated the reliability of a new point-of-care, inexpensive, WBC count device which requires only 10 µL (1 drop) of whole blood from a finger stick to an automated Cell-Dyn® counter in a busy office practice setting and assessed its reliability to assist in avoiding antibiotic prescribing. A total of 120 acutely ill children and potential antibiotic recipients were studied from October 2007 to March 2008. The mean WBC count was 7.4 x 109/L and 8.1 x 109/L for the new WBC device and the automated Cell-Dyn counter, respectively. The correlation between the 2 devices was high (r = .988, P = .005). A total of 88 children (73%) did not receive antibiotics and mean WBC was 7.2 x 109/L. In all, 32 children (27%) received an antibiotic and 1 (3%) returned for a follow-up office visit for the same or a related illness. Of the 88 children with a low blood count who did not receive an antibiotic, 3 (3%) had return visit within 30 days and received an antibiotic. A simple and quick point-ofcare WBC count device produces similar results as achievable with a Cell-Dyn counter for total WBCs and may assist in judicious antibiotic prescribing.

First published on December 2, 2008, doi:10.1177/0009922808327106

Clinical Pediatrics 2009;48:291.

A more recent version of this article appeared on April 1, 2009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?