| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Handedness Effects on Procedural Training in PediatricsDivision of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, djt2001{at}med.cornell.edu
Department of Public Health, New York Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York
Division of Emergency Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital/Children' Hospital of New York, New York
Division of Emergency Medicine, Akron Children's Hospital, Akron, Ohio
Division of Emergency Medicine, Akron Children's Hospital, Akron, Ohio Objective To determine handedness effects on procedural training. Patients and Methods Pediatric trainees and attendings from 3 institutions participated in a Web-based survey examining whether handedness affected learning procedures, the hand used to perform procedures, and if handedness training was received. Results and Conclusions Of 778 physicians, 39% completed surveys, and 11% wrote with their left hand. Learning procedures were affected in left-handed physicians (60% vs 7.7%; odds ratio [OR] = 17.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 7.9-40.1), and they used their non-dominant or both hands to perform procedures (48.6% vs 21%; OR = 3.6; 95% CI = 1.7-7.4). Few physicians received handedness training (20% vs 10.7%; P= .16). Left-handed physicians were affected learning lumbar puncture (29% vs 4%; OR= 10.0; 95% CI = 3.8-26.4), intubation (36% vs 5%; OR=11.0; 95% CI=4.4-27.4), and suturing (32% vs 4%; OR = 11.7; 95% CI = 4.5-30.5).
Key Words: dominant handedness procedural training resident training
This version was published on March
1, 2009 Clinical Pediatrics, Vol. 48, No. 2,
156-160 (2009) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
