This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Siberry, G. K. Articles by Karron, R. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Siberry, G. K. Articles by Karron, R. A. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Comparison of Temple Temperatures with Rectal Temperatures in Children Under Two Years of Age

Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine; Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Park 256, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287

Marie Diener-West, PhD

Department of Biostatistics, School of Hygiene & Public Health

Elizabeth Schappell, RN

Division of Disease Control, Department of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health; The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD

Ruth A. Karron, MD

Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine; Division of Disease Control, Department of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health; The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD

We assessed the agreement between rectal and noninvasive temporal artery temperature measurements in infants and children. We also evaluated the temple thermometer as a screening tool for rectal fever in this age group. Finally, we compared the performance of parents with that of nurses in using the temple thermometer. The 95% limits of agreement between the difference in rectal and average temple temperature were -1.03 and +1.52⁰C. Mean temple temperatures obtained by parents and by nurses were similar (95% limits of agreement, -0.6⁰C to +0.70C). A maximum temple temperature cutoff of 37.2°C (99.0°F) distinguished children with rectal fever of 238.0°C with 91% sensitivity and 53% specificity. A cutoff of 37.8⁰C (100.0⁰F) distinguished moderate rectal fevers (238.5°C) with 97% sensitivity and 84% specificity. A cutoff of 38.3°C (101.0°F) distinguished a high rectal fever (?39.0°C) with a sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 95%. In conclusion, temple temperatures do not reliably predict rectal temperatures, but the temple thermometer can be used as an effective screen for clinically important rectal fever in children 3-24 months old. The findings do not support use of temple temperatures to screen young infants for rectal fever 238.0°C. Temperatures obtained by parents were comparable to those obtained by nurses.

Clinical Pediatrics, Vol. 41, No. 6, 405-414 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/000992280204100605


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. O. Titus, T. Hulsey, J. Heckman, and J. D. Losek Temporal Artery Thermometry Utilization in Pediatric Emergency Care Clinical Pediatrics, March 1, 2009; 48(2): 190 - 193. [Abstract] [PDF]

				O. Kimberger, D. Cohen, U. Illievich, and R. Lenhardt Temporal Artery Versus Bladder Thermometry During Perioperative and Intensive Care Unit Monitoring Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2007; 105(4): 1042 - 1047. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. D. Hooper and J. O. Andrews Accuracy of noninvasive core temperature measurement in acutely ill adults: the state of the science. Biol Res Nurs, July 1, 2006; 8(1): 24 - 34. [Abstract] [PDF]