Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register

Clinical Pediatrics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yamamoto, L. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yamamoto, L. G.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Fever
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Revising the Decision Analysis for Febrile Children at Risk for Occult Bacteremia in a Future Era of Widespread Pneumococcal Immunization

Loren G. Yamamoto, MD, MPH, MBA

Department of Pediatrics, University of Hawaii John A. Burns School of Medicine, Emergency Department, Kapiolani Medical Center For Women And Children, Honolulu, HI

Previous decision analyses (DA), which have attempted to determine a superior management option for febrile children at risk for occult bacteremia, have come to different conclusions based on their underlying assumptions. Most DAs have recommended a laboratory evaluation with antibiotic treatment or have concluded that all management options are roughly the same. The purpose of this revised DA is to determine which management strategy will be superior in an anticipated era of widespread pneumococcal immunization. Decision analysis methodology comparing the following 3 management options: Obs: observation, no tests, no antibiotics; CBC+: Complete blood count (CBC) first; if the white blood cell count (WBC) >15,000, then blood culture (BC) plus antibiotics (Abx); BC+Abx: BC+Abx for all patients. Assumptions include a current bacteremia rate of 2% to 4%, and 95% of this bacteremia is caused by S. pneumococcus (which has a 15% persistent bacteremia rate) with the remainder caused by virulent bacteria (which has a 100% persistent bacteremia rate), and other assumptions made by previous decision analysis publications. Pneumococcal vaccine efficacy rates of 0%, 50%, 75%, and 100% in preventing pneumococcal bacteremia were analyzed. Overall death and neurologic sequelae rates are lower with efficacious pneumococcal vaccine. The Obs strategy is superior for all efficacy rates (including 0%) if the negative consequences of treatment are high. If the negative consequences of treatment are low, the CBC+ strategy is superior at pneumococcal vaccine efficacy rates of 50% or greater. The absolute differences between the outcomes of the 3 strategies are small, making them similar. This decision analysis indicates that widespread efficacious pneumococcal vaccine will reduce the overall morbidity and mortality associated with pneumococcal bacteremia. This favors the Obs strategy, but the superior management strategy is still dependent on an assumption of the negative consequences of treatment. Since the outcome measures for each of the management strategies are similar numerically, the strategy chosen in clinical practice may consider other factors associated with the clinical encounter such as those described.

Clinical Pediatrics, Vol. 40, No. 11, 583-594 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/000992280104001101


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
K. A. Madsen, J. E. Bennett, and S. M. Downs
The Role of Parental Preferences in the Management of Fever Without Source Among 3- to 36-Month-Old Children: A Decision Analysis
Pediatrics, April 1, 2006; 117(4): 1067 - 1076.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
A. P. Kourtis, D. T. Sullivan, and U. Sathian
Practice Guidelines for the Management of Febrile Infants Less Than 90 Days of Age at the Ambulatory Network of a Large Pediatric Health Care System in the United States: Summary of New Evidence
Clinical Pediatrics, January 1, 2004; 43(1): 11 - 16.
[PDF]