This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Rehan, V. K. Articles by Cook, V. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rehan, V. K. Articles by Cook, V. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Observer Variability in Interpretation of Abdominal Radiographs of Infants with Suspected Necrotizing Enterocolitis

Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island, 111 Brewster Street, Pawtucket, RI-02860, USA; Health Sciences Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

M. M. K. Seshia, MB, ChB

B. Johnston, PhD

M. Reed, MD

D. Wilmot, MD

V. Cook, RN

Health Sciences Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

We examined (1) the observer variability (both interobserver and intraobserver) in interpretation of abdominal radiographs of infants with suspected necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), (2) the interobserver variability for individual radiologic signs used to diagnose NEC, and (3) the influence of experience in determining the extent of observer variability. Our hypotheses were (1) there would be considerable observer variability in interpretation of abdominal radiographs of infants with suspected NEC; (2) the extent of observer variability would differ for individual radiologic signs of NEC; and (3) the extent of observer variability would be determined by the observer's experience. The participants included 12 observers: two pediatric radiologists, four attending neonatologists, three neonatal fellows, and three pediatric residents. The participating observers under similar interpretation conditions, twice independently, interpreted the same 40 pairs of abdominal radiographs from infants with suspected NEC. The interval between the two interpretations was 3 to 6 months. Intraobserver and interobserver variability was assessed by applying the Kappa statistic to the radiologic signs of NEC for the two separate interpretations. The observers were blinded to patient's identity and the clinical course. Each observer recorded the absence, suspicion, or presence of (1) intestinal distention, (2) air fluid levels, (3) bowel wall thickening, (4) pneumatosis intestinalis, (5) portal venous gas, (6) pneumoperitoneum, and (7) NEC. We found low intraobserver and interobserver agreements. There was considerable variation in observer variability for individual radiologic signs. Trained observers performed better than intraining observers. We conclude that the radiologic signs in isolation should not be considered reliable. We recommend studies to formulate more objective criteria for many of the radiographic features of NEC. Standardization and periodic enforcement of these criteria among observers could reduce observer variability. We suggest that, to decrease both false-negative and falsepositive interpretation, an experienced observer should always review the radiographs of infants with suspected NEC.

Clinical Pediatrics, Vol. 38, No. 11, 637-643 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/000992289903801102


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M Dordelmann, G A Rau, D Bartels, M Linke, N Derichs, C Behrens, and B Bohnhorst Evaluation of portal venous gas detected by ultrasound examination for diagnosis of necrotising enterocolitis Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., May 1, 2009; 94(3): F183 - F187. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. A. Coursey, C. L. Hollingsworth, A. M. Gaca, C. Maxfield, D. DeLong, and G. Bisset III Radiologists' Agreement When Using a 10-Point Scale to Report Abdominal Radiographic Findings of Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Neonates and Infants Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 190 - 197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Pourcyrous, S. B. Korones, W. Yang, T. F. Boulden, and H. S. Bada C-Reactive Protein in the Diagnosis, Management, and Prognosis of Neonatal Necrotizing Enterocolitis Pediatrics, November 1, 2005; 116(5): 1064 - 1069. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D L Harris, R L Teele, F H Bloomfield, J E Harding, and on behalf of the Australian and New Zealand Neonat Does variation in interpretation of ultrasonograms account for the variation in incidence of germinal matrix/intraventricular haemorrhage between newborn intensive care units in New Zealand? Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., November 1, 2005; 90(6): F494 - F499. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. P. Mathew, M. L. Fontes, S. Garwood, E. Davis, W. D. White, G. McCloskey, J. C.K. Fitch, S. Afifi, D. L. Lee, P. Kraker, et al. Transesophageal Echocardiography Interpretation: A Comparative Analysis Between Cardiac Anesthesiologists and Primary Echocardiographers Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2002; 94(2): 302 - 309. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]