Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Pediatrics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alon, U. S.
Right arrow Articles by Ganapathy, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alon, U. S.
Right arrow Articles by Ganapathy, S.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Urinary Tract Infections
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Should Renal Ultrasonography Be Done Routinely in Children with First Urinary Tract Infection?

Uri S. Alon, MD

Soumya Ganapathy, BSc

Section of Pediatric Nephrology, The Children's Mercy Hospital, University of Missouri at Kansas City, Missouri

To reassess the impact of renal ultrasonography on the care of children with first febrile urinary tract infection (UTI) we conducted a computer search and review of medical records of (1) all children who were admitted to our hospital with first febrile urinary tract infection and underwent renal ultrasonography during a 25-month period beginning February 1, 1995, (2) all children diagnosed by ultrasound to have hydronephrosis during the same time period. Of a total of 124 patients with UTI, renal ultrasound appeared normal or showed evidence of acute pyelonephritis in 105 (84.7%), and in another nine (7.2%) it showed only minor findings. In 10 children (8.1%) ultrasound showed hydronephrosis and/or hydroureter. In eight of the latter 10, voiding cystourethrography showed vesicoureteral reflux; in one, posterior urethral valves; and in one, who had a unilateral nonobstructed dilatated system, cystography appeared normal. Except for the last patient, who was given prophylactic antibiotics and continued to have urinary tract infections, in no other case did ultrasound alone have any impact on the patient's management. Four children with both abnormal-appearing renal ultrasound and voiding cystourethrography required surgical intervention. One hundred of the 124 children had a voiding cystourethrogram. In 38 children it detected vesicoureteral reflux and, in another two, bladder abnormalities. Thirty-five of those with abnormal-appearing cystogram but without an indication for surgery were given prophylactic antibiotics. During the same 25-month period, 63 children without urinary tract infection were diagnosed by ultrasound with hydronephrosis. In 45 of them (71.4%) the urologic abnormality had already been detected by prenatal ultrasound. Fourteen of these 45 children (31.1%) required surgery, all for congenital anomalies related to -obstructive uropathy. We conclude that routine renal ultrasonography in children with first urinary tract infection has negligible influence on their clinical management. This seems to be due to the recent widespread use, in industrialized countries, of maternal-fetal ultrasonography, which already detects a significant number of children with congenital obstructive uropathy prenatally. On the other hand imaging of the lower urinary tract is of high yield and contributes significantly to patient care. Therefore, whereas imaging of the lower urinary tract should continue to be done routinely in children with first urinary tract infection, renal ultrasound may be reserved for more select cases.

Clinical Pediatrics, Vol. 38, No. 1, 21-25 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/000992289903800103


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. Lim
Vesicoureteral Reflux and Urinary Tract Infection: Evolving Practices and Current Controversies in Pediatric Imaging
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2009; 192(5): 1197 - 1208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
D. Miron, A. Daas, W. Sakran, D. Lumelsky, A. Koren, and Y. Horovitz
Is omitting post urinary-tract-infection renal ultrasound safe after normal antenatal ultrasound? An observational study
Arch. Dis. Child., June 1, 2007; 92(6): 502 - 504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
G Zamir, W Sakran, Y Horowitz, A Koren, and D Miron
Urinary tract infection: is there a need for routine renal ultrasonography?
Arch. Dis. Child., May 1, 2004; 89(5): 466 - 468.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
A. Hoberman, M. Charron, R. W. Hickey, M. Baskin, D. H. Kearney, and E. R. Wald
Imaging Studies after a First Febrile Urinary Tract Infection in Young Children
N. Engl. J. Med., January 16, 2003; 348(3): 195 - 202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
U. S. Alon;, S. Hellerstein, and K. B. Roberts
More on Urinary Tract Infection Guidelines
Pediatrics, April 1, 2001; 107(4): 806 - 806.
[Full Text]