Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register

Clinical Pediatrics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feder, H. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sadre, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Feder, H. M., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Sadre, I.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Rabies Prophylaxis Following the Feeding of a Rabid Pony

Henry M. Feder, Jr, MD

Department of Pediatrics, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT; Department of Family Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT

Randall S. Nelson, MD

Matthew L. Cartter, MD

Department of Connecticut Department of Public Health, Hartford, CT

Irene Sadre, MD

Department of Pediatrics University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT

A survey was performed to identify people who were exposed to a rabid pony and determine whether or not they received rabies postexposure prophylaxis (PEP). Sixty-one visitors who came in contact with the rabid pony were identified. These visitors heard about the rabid pony via the news media. Forty-five visitors were exposed during the 2 weeks before the pony died. Thirtytwo of these 45 visitors received PEP. Thirty-one visitors had or may have had saliva contact to an open wound or mucosa and all 31 received PEP. Fourteen visitors had no saliva contact to a wound or mucosa and one received PEP. Sixteen visitors were exposed before the pony was potentially shedding rabies virus and one received PEP. No visitor was bitten by the pony. Most of the persons 31/33 (94%) who received PEP had an exposure for which PEP was indicated. Nonbite transmission of rabies is discussed.

Clinical Pediatrics, Vol. 37, No. 8, 477-481 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/000992289803700803
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?