Clinical Pediatrics

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Powers, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Powers, J. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Clinical Pediatrics, Vol. 37, No. 7, 405-412 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/000992289803700702

Tetracaine-Lidocaine-Phenylephrine Topical Anesthesia Compared with Lidocaine Infiltration During Repair of Mucous Membrane Lacerations in Children

Gary A. Smith, MD, DrPH

Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio; Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Drive, Columbus, Ohio 43205

Daniel M. Cohen, MD

Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio

Steven D. Strausbaugh, RPh

The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio

Brenda J. Shields, MS

Cynthia Harbeck-Weber, PhD

Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio

Jean D. Powers, PhD

Children's Hospital Research Foundation, Columbus, Ohio

This study compared the effectiveness of a new topical anesthetic, tetracaine-lidocaine phenylephrine (TetraLidoPhen), with that of lidocaine infiltration during repair of mucous membrane lacerations in children. It was conducted in the emergency department of an urban children's hospital with use of a prospective, randomized, blinded study design. Participants were 90 children 1 year of age or older with a laceration 5 cm or less in length on or near a mucous membrane that required suturing. They were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups, with 45 patients in each group. Pain felt during suturing was scored by suture technicians, research assistants, a videotape reviewer, parents, and patients 5 years of age and older using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Suture technicians, research assistants, a videotape reviewer, and parents also scored pain using a seven-point Likert scale. In addition, suture technicians completed an Anesthesia Effectiveness scale and a Wound Blanching scale. The laceration was located near the eyes in 71 patients (79%), and on or near the lips in 19 (21%). Lidocaine infiltration performed significantly better than topical TetraLidoPhen in comparisons of Likert scores of suture technicians (P=0.007), research assistants (P=0.005), the videotape reviewer (P=0.003), and parents (P=0.03); Anesthetic Effectiveness scale scores of suture technicians (P=0.00002; relative risk (RR)=1.83, 95% confidence interval 1.36<RR<2.46); and VAS scores of suture technicians (P=0.002), research assistants (P=0.001), and the videotape reviewer (P=0.005). No significant difference in performance was detected between lidocaine and TetraLidoPhen in comparing VAS scores of parents and patients. There was a 4.4% wound complication rate, including two (2.2%) wound infections. The authors conclude that TetraLidoPhen is a new topical anesthetic that appears to be safe when applied on or near mucous membranes. Its performance among study participants was statistically inferior to that of lidocaine infiltration; however, the differences in pain scores were small and may not be clinically significant. Also, comparisons of pain scores in this study did not take into account the pain associated with the initial injection of lidocaine. Therefore, study findings may underestimate the comparative performance of TetraLidoPhen. Further investigation of this new topical anesthetic is warranted.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
M. Vaughan, E. A. Paton, A. Bush, and J. Pershad
Does Lidocaine Gel Alleviate the Pain of Bladder Catheterization in Young Children? A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Pediatrics, October 1, 2005; 116(4): 917 - 920.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
B. J. Shields, D. M. Cohen, C. Harbeck-Weber, J. D. Powers, and G. A. Smith
Pediatric Pain Measurement Using a Visual Analogue Scale: A Comparison of Two Teaching Methods
Clinical Pediatrics, April 1, 2003; 42(3): 227 - 234.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Emerg. Med. J.Home page
S Bush
Is cocaine needed in topical anaesthesia?
Emerg. Med. J., September 1, 2002; 19(5): 418 - 422.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]