This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Parra, J. M. Articles by Foulds, D. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Parra, J. M. Articles by Foulds, D. M. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Resident Documentation of Diagnostic Impression in Sexual Abuse Evaluations

Rebecca L. Huston, MD, MPH

D. Michael Foulds, MD

Department of Pediatrics, Division of General Pediatrics, The University of Texas Health Science Center, at San Antonio, Texas

In sexual abuse evaluations, the documentation of the examiner's diagnostic impression is essential. If the diagnostic impression is not documented, the examiner will have to rely on memory rather than the medical record when called to testify. The purpose of this study was to determine whether pediatric residents adequately document their diagnostic impression in child sexual abuse evaluations. We performed a three-year retrospective chart review from patients 0-17 years of age who were evaluated at our emergency room for suspected sexual abuse. We reviewed 1,487 charts for historical information, physical findings, and diagnostic impression. Physical findings were categorized as normal, nonspecific, suggestive, or indicative of penetration. In 77% of cases (N=256) with hymenal findings indicative of penetration and 84% of cases (N=31) with vaginal findings indicative of penetration, residents recorded no impression or a nonspecific impression. Results were similar for vulvar and rectal findings indicative of penetration. Residents fail to document an adequate interpretation of their physical examinations in sexual abuse evaluations.

Clinical Pediatrics, Vol. 36, No. 12, 691-694 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/000992289703601204


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. S. Botash, A. E. Galloway, T. Booth, R. Ploutz-Snyder, J. Hoffman-Rosenfeld, and L. Cahill Continuing Medical Education in Child Sexual Abuse: Cognitive Gains but Not Expertise Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, June 1, 2005; 159(6): 561 - 566. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A Loredo-Abdala, J H Treho, and V V Bustos Resident Documentation of Diagnostic Impression in Sexual Abuse Evaluations Clinical Pediatrics, January 1, 1999; 38(1): 61 - 61. [PDF]