This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Casey, R. Articles by Pinto-Martin, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Casey, R. Articles by Pinto-Martin, J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Longitudinal Assessment for Lead Poisoning

Division of General Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia

Catherine Wiley

Division of General Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia

Richard Rutstein

Division of General Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia

Jennifer Pinto-Martin

Division of General Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia

In a previous study, we showed that in our region the prevalence of lead poisoning (Pb 10 µg/dL [0.483 µmol/L]) was high (29%) among urban infants. The objectives of this study were to assess the prevalence of lead poisoning over time in this cohort to determine the best screening strategy. Eighty nine percent (115/129) of infants who were initially screened for lead poisoning between 6 and 12 months of age had a repeat venous lead level by age 3 years (=19.8 months). The majority (70%) lived in a major city and had private medical insurance (80%). The initial and repeat mean venous lead levels were similar for the overall population (lead₁ = 8.7 µg/dL ± 6.2 [0.420 ± 0.299 µmol/L] and lead2 = 7.7 µg/dL ± 6.8 [0.371 ± 0.328 µmol/L]). However, the percentage of lead-poisoned (Pb 10 µg/dL or 0.483 µmol/L) children whose levels were 15 µg/dL (0.724 µmol/L) increased from 28% to 48% on repeat. The utility of the initial screen in predicting a second elevated lead level 20 µg/dL (0.966 µmol/L) was as follows: sensitivity = 33%, specificity = 97%, positive predictive value = 40%, negative predictive value = 96%. We conclude that in this population, a single screen at 18-24 months of age would reduce the need for multiple venipunctures and would detect those children in need of an intervention.

Clinical Pediatrics, Vol. 35, No. 2, 58-61 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/000992289603500201


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?