Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Pediatrics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gibson, E.
Right arrow Articles by Spitzer, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gibson, E.
Right arrow Articles by Spitzer, A. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Documented Home Apnea Monitoring: Effect on Compliance, Duration of Monitoring, and Validation of Alarm Reporting

Eric Gibson, M.D.

Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Thomas Jefferson University, 1025 Walnut Street, Suite 700, Philadelphia, PA 19107

Susan Spinner, M.S.N.

James A. Cullen, R.N.

Heidi A. Wrobel, R.N.

Alan R. Spitzer, M.D.

Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA

The objectives of this study were to: (1) measure patient compliance with monitoring, (2) validate parental reports of alarms at home, (3) examine monitoring duration, and (4) compare documented monitor records with the traditional pneumogram to evaluate patients for monitor discontinuation. During the 1-year period fromJanuary through December, 1992, 114 infants were followed up with documented monitoring. Simultaneously, 113 infants were followed up with conventional monitors. Infants were premature, or victims of apparent life-threatening episodes (ALTE), or siblings of SIDS victims. Monitors recorded all episodes of apnea greater than 15 seconds and bradycardia loss than 80 beats per minute. All families were contacted biweekly by telephone. Downloads were performed at regular intervals. Monitor downloads were compared with simultaneous pneumograms to assess the accuracy of a long-term, intermittent event-recording system versus short-term (6-to 12-hour) continuous recording. All families were highly compliant with the use of home monitoring. Although Caucasian families used the monitors more often than non-Caucasian families, all groups used the monitor >75% of the time. True episodes were verified in 38% of patients by monitor downloads. Only 7.4% of all recorded events were true events. Of the real events, 51.2% were apneas of 16-20 seconds. No significant differences were found in overall duration of monitoring between documented and nondocumented monitors. In the premature infants, the duration of monitoring was significantly reduced in those infants found to have no true episodes over those with real events at home. Readmission for ALTE was reduced in infants with documented monitors. Premature infants without events were monitored an average of 24 fewer days (P=0.03). Computerized monitor downloads were found to be equally, if not more, sensitive than pneumograms in evaluating infants for monitor discontinuation. Documented monitoring offers a viable alternative to traditional monitoring and pneumograms in assisting clinicians and families in evaluating their infant's progress. By accurately assessing compliance, distinguishing true from false alarms, and decreasing the need for pneumograms, these devices provide valuable information to clinicians and families.

Clinical Pediatrics, Vol. 35, No. 10, 505-513 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/000992289603501006


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
A. C. Halbower
Pediatric Home Apnea Monitors: Coding, Billing, and Updated Prescribing Information for Practice Management
Chest, August 1, 2008; 134(2): 425 - 429.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
J. M. Silvestri, G. Lister, M. J. Corwin, S. M. Smok-Pearsall, T. M. Baird, D. H. Crowell, J. Cantey-Kiser, C. E. Hunt, L. Tinsley, P. H. Palmer, et al.
Factors That Influence Use of a Home Cardiorespiratory Monitor for Infants: The Collaborative Home Infant Monitoring Evaluation
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, January 1, 2005; 159(1): 18 - 24.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
E A. Balas and I. Iakovidis
Distance technologies for patient monitoring
BMJ, November 13, 1999; 319(7220): 1309 - 1309.
[Full Text]