Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Pediatrics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rainey, D. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Lawless, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rainey, D. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Lawless, M. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Infant Positioning and SIDS

Acceptance of the Nonprone Position Among Clinic Mothers

David Y. Rainey

Department of Pediatrics Bowman Gray School of Medicine Wake Forest University Winston-Salem, North Carolina

Michael R. Lawless

Department of Pediatrics Bowman Gray School of Medicine Wake Forest University Winston-Salem, North Carolina

In April 1992, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommended that healthy infants not be placed prone to sleep because of the association between the prone sleeping position and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). We determined the awareness and acceptance of this recommendation among 190 mothers attending a community health center pediatric clinic in the first year after the recommendation. Ninety-seven women (51.1 %) had heard the recommendation. The compliance with the recommendation among women who had heard it was 63.9% (62 of 97). Fifty-three percent of all the mothers worried that their infant would choke in the supine position. More education is necessary in this population to improve acceptance of this new recommendation and to correct misinformation about the supine position.

Clinical Pediatrics, Vol. 33, No. 6, 322-324 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/000992289403300601


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
R. Y. Moon, T. Calabrese, and L. Aird
Reducing the Risk of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome in Child Care and Changing Provider Practices: Lessons Learned From a Demonstration Project
Pediatrics, October 1, 2008; 122(4): 788 - 798.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
M. C. Ottolini, B. E. Davis, K. Patel, H. C. Sachs, N. B. Gershon, and R. Y. Moon
Prone Infant Sleeping Despite the "Back to Sleep" Campaign
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, May 1, 1999; 153(5): 512 - 517.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]