Clinical Pediatrics

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, G. N.
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, E. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, G. N.
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, E. B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Clinical Pediatrics, Vol. 33, No. 12, 726-730 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/000992289403301204

A Perspective on Controversies Over Neonatal Circumcision

Gerald N. Weiss

Charge, North Little Rock Veterans Administration Medical Center, and Clinical Surgical Faculty, University of Arkansas Medical Center; Currently Medical Director, RPR Plasma Alliance, Little Rock, Arkansas

Elaine B. Weiss

Continuing Medical Education for Nurses, McNeese State University, Lake Charles, Louisiana, Retired

Controversy continues to surround the issue of male circumcision, especially in the United States. The following report reviews the history of this practice, along with the medical and sociopolitical positions currently espoused. It is our conclusion that, as the safest and most commonly performed surgical procedure in this country, the benefits of posthetomy, which include a reduction in some kinds of cancer and sexually transmitted diseases, well outweigh the risks cited by those who oppose it.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of HealthHome page
R. S Van Howe, J S. Svoboda, and F. M Hodges
HIV infection and circumcision: cutting through the hyperbole
The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health, November 1, 2005; 125(6): 259 - 265.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 CLIN PEDIATRHome page
P. M. Fleiss, L. M. Robson, A. K.C. Leung, R. S. Van Howe, and G. Weiss
A Perspective on Controversies About Neonatal Circumcision
Clinical Pediatrics, July 1, 1995; 34(7): 395 - 399.
[PDF]