This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Rose, C. D. Articles by Doughty, R. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rose, C. D. Articles by Doughty, R. A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Overdiagnosis of Lyme Disease in Children Residing in an Endemic Area

Division of Rheumatology, The Alfred I. duPont Institute, Wilmington, Delaware, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Paul T. Fawcett, Ph.D.

Division of Immunology, The Alfred I. duPont Institute, Wilmington, Delaware, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Kathleen M. Gibney, B.S., M.T.

Division of Immunology, The Alfred I. duPont Institute, Wilmington, Delaware, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Robert A. Doughty, M.D., Ph.D.

Division of Rheumatology, The Alfred I. duPont Institute, Wilmington, Delaware, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

The medical records of 227 children ages 1 to 19 years referred to the Lyme disease pediatric clinic over a 32-month period since May 1990 were reviewed. Clinico-serologic criteria for a positive diagnosis were applied. One hundred thirty-eight of 227 referred children did not fulfill those criteria and became the study population. Four subsets of patients emerged: (1) 54 patients with predominantly subjective symptoms; (2) 52 patients with objective evidence for an alternative diagnosis; (3) eight patients who had documented infection in the past and continued with symptoms after antibiotic treatment; and (4) 24 patients with a history of tick attachment or prenatal/family history of Lyme disease. Serologic testing data from commercial laboratories were available for the 54 children from the "predominantly subjective" group; 50% were negative, and 50% were borderline or positive. Ninety-two percent of these patients were negative at retesting by our enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and 100% were negative by Western blot. Fifty-seven percent of these patients had received treatment prior to our evaluation. Children residing in an endemic area who present with vague symptoms are being diagnosed with and treated for Lyme disease without clinical or serologic documentation. In addition, fear in the lay community may be inducing doctors to diagnose Lyme disease in patients with symptoms that may be suggestive of an alternative diagnosis.

Clinical Pediatrics, Vol. 33, No. 11, 663-668 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/000992289403301105


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. T. Saulsbury Lyme Arthritis in 20 Children Residing in a Non-Endemic Area Clinical Pediatrics, June 1, 2005; 44(5): 419 - 421. [Abstract] [PDF]