Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Pediatrics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Page Glascoe, F.
Right arrow Articles by Byrne, K. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Page Glascoe, F.
Right arrow Articles by Byrne, K. E.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Child Development
*Developmental Disabilities
*Infant and Toddler Development
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Usefulness of the Developmental Profile-II in Developmental Screening

Frances Page Glascoe, Ph.D.

Child Development Center, Vanderbilt University, 2100 Pierce Avenue, Nashville, TN 37232

Karen E. Byrne, M.A.

Child Development Center Department of Pediatrics Vanderbilt University Nashville, Tennessee

Timely provision of early developmental intervention depends on accurate developmental screening tests. The Developmental Profile-II (DP-II) relies on parent report to assess children from birth to 7 years old. One of its subtests, the Academic scale, is designed for developmental screening. To test its accuracy in detecting children with problems, the scale was administered to parents of 94 children between 6 and 75 months old. Each child was also given a battery of tests, such as the Bayley Scales of Infant Development and the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale. The Academic scale detected only 21 % of the 19 children thus determined as having developmental problems, while 85% of the nondiagnosed children received normal or advanced scores on DP-II. Analysis revealed that DP-II scoring criteria are far too lenient and that many items are poorly placed in relation to age expectations. Alternative cutoff scores greatly improved sensitivity. DP-II is a potentially accurate measure that needs updating and restandardizing. Alternative tests include the Minnesota Child Development Inventory and the Battelle Developmental Inventory Screening Test.

Clinical Pediatrics, Vol. 32, No. 4, 203-208 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/000992289303200402
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?