| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Noninvasive Methods for Estimating In Vivo OxygenationDivision of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, 750 Welch Road, Rm. 315, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305
Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Lucile Salter Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Lucile Salter Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Lucile Salter Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California Clinical signs of hypoxia and hyperoxia are nonspecific and unreliable, yet both are potentially injurious. Noninvasive methods of oxygen assessment fill the gap between clinical observation and invasive tests, helping physicians deliver sufficient oxygen with minimum toxicity. Potential sites for oxygen measurement vary between the blood and the mitochondria; each method measures at a different site and detects different types of hypoxia and hyperoxia. Thus, values obtained by two different methods are not equivalent, giving each method unique strengths and weaknesses. We review two clinical methods (pulse oximetry and transcutaneous oximetry), as well as four experimental methods (near-infrared spectrophotometry, magnetic resonance spectroscopy, magnetic resonance saturation imaging, and time-of-flight absorbance spectrophotometry). The principles of each method and the clinical situations in which each succeeds or fails are discussed. A fundamental understanding of each method can help in deciding which methods, if any, are appropriate for a given patient and how best to correct observed oxygenation problems once they are discovered.
Clinical Pediatrics, Vol. 31, No. 5,
258-273 (1992) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||



