This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Alexander, D. Articles by Kelly, B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Alexander, D. Articles by Kelly, B. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Cost Effectiveness of Tympanic Thermometry in the Pediatric Office Setting

Assistant Professor of Pediatrics and Clinical Assistant Professor of Pediatrics, 4 Highland, Abington Memorial Hospital, 1200 York Road, Abington, PA 19001

Barbara Kelly, MD

Assistant Professor of Pediatrics and Clinical Assistant Professor of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

This study was designed to see if tympanic thermometry might be more cost effective than cheaper more traditional methods of thermometry when office staff time saved is taken into account. There were 224 patients enrolled from three private pediatric practices. Patients were alternately assigned to have their temperature taken with either a tympanic thermometer or with a rectal or oral thermometer depending on the patient's age. For each child enrolled in the study a nurse was asked to time the temperature taking process. Items included in the cost analysis: a) thermometer costs; b) disposable supply costs; c) personnel costs; d) equipment service costs.

The mean duration of temperature taking was 35.2 seconds using tympanic thermometers, 73.4 seconds using electronic predictive thermometers, and 247.2 seconds using glass thermometers. In practices taking an average of 10 temperatures per day, tympanic thermometry saved $2,316/year when compared to glass thermometers and $442 /year when compared to electronic predictive thermometers.

The data presented in this study show that when nursing time is taken into account, tympanic thermometry is less expensive to perform than traditional methods of thermometry despite the initial higher cost of the thermometer.

Clinical Pediatrics, Vol. 30, No. 4 suppl, 57-59 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/000992289103000417


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?