Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Pediatrics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosenbloom, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosenbloom, A. L.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Growth Disorders
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Height Screening in the Community The Commercialization of Growth

The Role of the Pediatrician

Arlan L. Rosenbloom, MD

Department of Pediatrics, Box J-296 JHMHC, Gainesville, FL 32610

The availability of unlimited but costly supplies of biosynthetic growth hormone has led to pressure for pharmacologic use (as opposed to replacement therapy in proven deficiency states). Commercial and altruistic motives have converged to promote community height screening among individuals who have been perceived by themselves or parents as short. This does not meet accepted criteria for health screening. Height screening of large populations of children yields few unrecognized medical conditions. If the goal of community screening is to identify abnormally short individuals (<3%) who might benefit from growth hormone treatment and if the unproven assumption is correct that stature correlates with success and happiness, then those less likely to appear for screening need to be recruited to avoid elitist domination. The annual cost of such growth promotion would be >$10 billion, with no evidence for substantial health benefits. Growth monitoring of all children through improved height measurement in schools and in physicians' offices, as part of health supervision, is a more sound community approach than height screening.

Clinical Pediatrics, Vol. 29, No. 5, 288-292 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/000992289002900507


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
L. Cuttler, J. B. Silvers, J. Singh, U. Marrero, B. Finkelstein, G. Tannin, and D. Neuhauser
Short Stature and Growth Hormone Therapy: A National Study of Physician Recommendation Patterns
JAMA, August 21, 1996; 276(7): 531 - 537.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
J. P. Frindik, S. F. Kemp, F. S. Kearns, and B. Hale
Growth Screening: A Positive Medical Experience
Clinical Pediatrics, August 1, 1992; 31(8): 497 - 500.
[PDF]