This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Grossman, L. K. Articles by Cordero, L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Grossman, L. K. Articles by Cordero, L. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Breast Feeding Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Breastfeeding Among Low-Income, High-risk Women

Room 2100, 456 West 10th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210

Janet B. Larsen-Alexander, MD

Ohio State University College of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Columbus, Ohio

Sharon M. Fitzsimmons, MD

Ohio State University College of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Columbus, Ohio

Leandro Cordero, MD

Ohio State University College of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Columbus, Ohio

Data from a state supported project providing multidiscipline (clinical social work, nursing, nutrition, obstetrics, and pediatrics) assistance to low-income women judged to be at high perinatal risk by medical and social history were analyzed regarding infant feeding decisions. Data from 2,124 subjects delivered from 1976 to 1985 were available for analysis. The population tended to be single (77%), black (66%), poorly educated (63% less than a high school education), and young (mean age 21.8 years). Thirty-six percent were primiparas. The decision to breastfeed was associated with white race, older maternal age, higher educational level, marriage, and earlier utilization of prenatal care.

Prenatal infant feeding plans were compared with actual postpartum decisions for 1,168 women. Only 3 percent of those initially planning to bottle feed changed their minds postpartum and breastfed although 31 percent of those initially planning to nurse ultimately chose artificial feeding. Ten percent of women were initially undecided; one-third of this group ultimately breastfed, two-thirds bottle fed.

Overall the percentage of women in the project who were breastfeeding rose from 15 percent to 22 percent from the early to later years of the project (p < 0.0001).

Clinical Pediatrics, Vol. 28, No. 1, 38-42 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/000992288902800109


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. J. Chantry, C. R. Howard, and P. Auinger Full Breastfeeding Duration and Associated Decrease in Respiratory Tract Infection in US Children Pediatrics, February 1, 2006; 117(2): 425 - 432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Brownell, L. Hutton, J. Hartman, and S. Dabrow Barriers to Breastfeeding Among African American Adolescent Mothers Clinical Pediatrics, November 1, 2002; 41(9): 669 - 673. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. M. Kiehl, G. C. Anderson, M. E. Wilson, and L. Fosson Social Status, Mother-infant Time Together, and Breastfeeding Duration J Hum Lact, September 1, 1996; 12(3): 201 - 206. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. B. Brent, B. Redd, A. Dworetz, F. D'Amico, and J. J. Greenberg Breast-feeding in a Low-Income Population: Program to Increase Incidence and Duration Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, July 1, 1995; 149(7): 798 - 803. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. C. Gielen, R. R. Faden, P. O'Campo, and D. M. Paige Determinants of Breastfeeding in a Rural WIC Population J Hum Lact, March 1, 1992; 8(1): 11 - 15. [Abstract] [PDF]