Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Pediatrics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fosarelli, P. D.
Right arrow Articles by DeAngelis, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fosarelli, P. D.
Right arrow Articles by DeAngelis, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Outpatient Radiographic Exposure in the First Five Years of Life

Patricia D. Fosarelli

The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland 21205

Catherine DeAngelis

The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland 21205

Young children receive a variety of diagnostic radiographs over time. In some cases the exposure to radiation may be unwarranted because the films may yield confusing results, or may also need to be repeated because of poor technical quality. Even when the results are clearly negative, the subsequent treatment may proceed as if the film had been positive because of the child's clinical condition. The cumulative effect of such low-dose radiation on infants and children over time is unknown.

The number and types of outpatient radiographs received by a cohort of poor children from a hospital-based continuity clinic during their first 5 years of life were reviewed. Also noted were the reason for obtaining the film, whether it was positive for that reason or another, whether the child had a chronic condition that prompted the use of radiograph, and the child's sex, race, and age when the film was obtained.

Of the 218 children, 132 (60.6%) received 349 sets of films in their first 5 years. There was no difference in the number of films by race or sex. Chest and posttrauma bone or joint films accounted for 315 sets of films or 90.3% of the total. Overall, 25.8% of the 267 chest films were positive; this varied by age. Only 15% of the chest films were positive in the first year compared with 29 to 49% in the second through fifth years (p < 0.001). Cough was the respiratory symptom most reliably associated with a positive chest film, both for the cohort (p < 0.0001) and for children in the first year of life (p < 0.01). Of the 132 children who had received a radiograph, 77 (58.3%) had some type of chronic condition, but only 33.5% of their films were directly related to those conditions. Of the children who received films, those with any chronic condition received more films in general (2.99 versus 2.10, p < 0.01) and chest films in particular (2.39 versus 1.44, p < 0.01) than did children without a chronic condition.

Clinical Pediatrics, Vol. 26, No. 6, 296-301 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/000992288702600606


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
E. M. Mahabee-Gittens, D. T. Bachman, E. D. Shapiro, and M. D. Dowd
Chest Radiographs in the Pediatric Emergency Department for Children <=18 Months of Age with Wheezing
Clinical Pediatrics, July 1, 1999; 38(7): 395 - 399.
[Abstract] [PDF]