This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Moore, W. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Moore, W. R. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Caustic Ingestions

Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment

Fort Worth Pediatric Clinic, Fort Worth, Texas

More than 5,000 caustic ingestions are estimated to occur each year. Liquid lye is associated with the greatest morbidity. Endoscopy is the only method for evaluating the extent of the injury; clinical signs and symptoms (e.g., vomiting, dysphagia, abdominal pain, oral burns, leukocytosis) are not reliable. In less severe burns (involving only mucosal irritation or ulceration), current therapy with antibiotics and steroids results in a very favorable prognosis. Circumferential or very deep burns have a much poorer outcome, with a greatly increased risk of stricture formation and/ or perforation. The risk of developing esophageal carcinoma may be 1,000 times greater for individuals who have had a lye burn than in the general population. It cannot be overemphasized that prevention is still the key to decreasing this morbidity.

Clinical Pediatrics, Vol. 25, No. 4, 192-196 (1986)
DOI: 10.1177/000992288602500404


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?