Clinical Pediatrics

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lewak, N.
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, S. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lewak, N.
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, S. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Clinical Pediatrics, Vol. 23, No. 7, 369-373 (1984)
DOI: 10.1177/000992288402300701

Management of Infants with Apnea and Potential Apnea

A Survey of Pediatric Opinion

Norman Lewak

Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California

Bradley H. Zebal

Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry of the Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland

Stanford B. Friedman

Division of Behavioral Pediatrics of the Department of Pediatrics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland

Conflicting opinions and inadequate data have led to confusion regarding the relationship of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) and infantile apnea. Consensus regarding appropriate eval uation and management strategies for infants presumed at risk has not been reached. This study surveyed pediatric opinion regarding these issues. Questionnaires were mailed to 1000 randomly selected members of the American Academy of Pediatrics, and to faculty at all approved U.S. pediatric residency programs. Results indicated that respondents as a group were uncertain about the relationship between SIDS and apnea. Most respondents would (1) initially evaluate infants presenting with apnea at either a hospital or an apnea evaluation center, (2) refer subsequent siblings of SIDS infants to an apnea center, and (3) recommend no intervention, but provide reassurance, to anxious parents requesting a "test for SIDS" for a normal newborn. Respondents' comments showed diverse opinions regarding appropriate evaluation and management strategies for these three types of infants, and reflected concern regarding dilemmas posed to clinicians responsible for their care. Further research and continuing medical education efforts are needed to reduce current confusion.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?