Clinical Pediatrics

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zachmann, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nessi, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zachmann, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nessi, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Clinical Pediatrics, Vol. 23, No. 11, 609-616 (1984)
DOI: 10.1177/000992288402301102

Theoretical Growth Evaluation (TGE)

A Computerized Screening System for Growth Disorders

Milo Zachmann, MD

Department of Pediatrics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, and Serono Laboratories, Inc., Geneva, Switzerland and Randolph, Massachusetts

Pierre Nessi, PhD

Department of Pediatrics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, and Serono Laboratories, Inc., Geneva, Switzerland and Randolph, Massachusetts

A computerized screening system for growth disorders is presented. Its aim is to save time and to facilitate the decision of whether a patient with a suspected growth problem should be referred for specialized evaluation. It uses accepted methods and common sense, and has been shown to be effective. A radiography of the hand and wrist, and a completed data sheet (birth date, date of x-ray, height and weight, parental height, and in girls, whether menarche has occurred) are mailed for analysis. Bone age is rated according to Greulich and Pyle, and Tanner et al. by trained technicians, and the results are supervised by a consultant pediatric endocrinol ogist. The supplied data and bone age values are then processed by a computer, which compares them with normal values, calculates three different height predictions (Bayley and Pinneau, Roche et al., Tanner et al.), as well as "target height" (estimation of genetic potential), and prints an easy-to-read growth curve. Depending on the constellations of height (normal, below 3rd, above 97th percentile), bone age (normal, retarded, advanced in comparison with chronologic age), and height predictions vs. target height (predictions within, below, above target height range), different messages suggesting the most likely diagnostic possibilities are listed on a computer printout.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?