Clinical Pediatrics

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to browse AJSM online!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Philip, A. G. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Philip, A. G. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Clinical Pediatrics, Vol. 21, No. 4, 210-214 (1982)
DOI: 10.1177/000992288202100403

Neonatal Sepsis Resulting from Possible Amniotic Fluid Infection

Risk and Detection

Alistair G. S. Philip

Department of Pediatrics, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont

Antibiotics are frequently prescribed "prophylactically" when the neonate is considered to be at risk for infection. The risk factors of prolonged rupture of membranes (>24 hours), maternal fever/infection, and/or unexplained preterm labor (suggesting possible amniotic fluid infection) were investigated in 276 babies. Only two of 150 babies investigated for a single factor proved to have sepsis, while of the 126 babies who had multiple factors, 13 had sepsis.

Several laboratory tests, used singly or in combination, were more helpful than clinical manifestations in predicting which babies were likely to be infected. Neo natal sepsis was present in 6 per cent of the total, in 10 per cent of neonates with clinical signs, in 21 per cent with an increased immature/total neutrophil ratio (I/T ratio ≥ 0.2), and in 36 per cent of infants with a positive "sepsis screen." The incidence of "infection" (sepsis and "very probable" infection) was 12 per cent overall, but was 14 per cent with neonatal signs, 44 per cent with I/T ratio ≥0.2, and 74 per cent in those with a positive sepsis screen. A leukocyte count < 5,000/ cu mm and/or an I/T ratio ≥ 0.2 was 100 per cent sensitive for sepsis, but the sepsis screen was most "efficient" at detecting "infection."

Starting antibiotics on the basis of risk factors alone does not seem appropriate. In situations where amniotic fluid infection is possible, evaluation with the leu kocyte count and differential (with or without other tests) could decrease the indiscriminate use of antibiotics, particularly when a single risk factor is the reason for suspecting infection.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?