Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Pediatrics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Patil, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Zellweger, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Patil, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Zellweger, H.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Genetics Home Reference
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Myth of Nonmongoloid Trisomy G

Shivanand R. Patil

Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa

Hans Zellweger

Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa

Reexamination of the chromosomes of a patient previously reported as having trisomy 22 yielded a partial trisomy of chromosome 13. Observations led to the conclusion that not every trisomy of a small acrocentric autosome in an individual without mongoloid features represents trisomy 22. Chromo somal analysis, preferably with a high resolution banding, of the parents may help in establishing the correct provenance of the extra chromosomal fragment. The clinical picture of partial trisomy of the proximal portion of chromosome 13 is fairly typical, yet by no means pathognomonic.

Clinical Pediatrics, Vol. 20, No. 8, 534-536 (1981)
DOI: 10.1177/000992288102000810
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?